
Whitworth Talk
Fanni Niemi- Junkola is an artist and lecturer from Finland.
Studied at Glasgow School Of art
Notes on lecture.
Junkola feels her work has a sculpture thinking basis of a moving image. She insisted it is not 'cinematic. I am not interested in films'.
The content of her work has a political aspect ('an artist always has to take a political stand???')
Junkola presented a video entitled 'childs' a video installation. The video is on loop displaying a fight between two woman. There appears to be no end to the fight (more to the point... is the a point to the fight) well Junkola feels the fight is a gender issue. Which she feels woman are often treated like children.
Studying in Glasgow Junkola experienced a level of culture shock- woman 'were plain, silenced' in Finland woman are louder. There is a question of stereotype which is something Junkola is readily expressing.
The video is a reflecting into the artists lifestyle she is trained in karate and this is shown in the video. Is the fighting an act? Its almost theatrical as there is no intention to hurt each other.
Junkola used other versions of the fight... with a man? Having to make a decision about a real life performance for the pictorial sense of a work. The film is slowed down slightly- softening the movements.
There is a question of domestic violence? A political issue thus raised again. Junkola remarks on video being quite pictorial for a cinematic viewing.
To Begin
Video Installation, 2000
The video installation is an example of an 'artistic attitude'working all the time. The video is basically Junkola's experience to giving birth. There is subtility to the image. The video is dealing with the selected image- by the artist. It appears almost violent and brutal like something else is happening. The artist is commenting on technology and the human being. She doesnt want to imply birth but a medical focus which is an opening to the world- not just for woman.
The video displays a level of endurance and loneliness 'how lonely can one be?'. 2 people play role in the video this only heightens the loneliness.
Both of the artists videos are quite violent, visceral?
'the works display a removel of pain' 'the emotional contents is removed'
This is the artists personal and artistic choice to hold back- she doesnt want to redo what has been done. (could it be seen as continued?)
'Raising an discussion or a topic is a artistic gesture rather than repeating'
'There is no end to violence or being physically brutal?' Junkola is not interested in shocking but underlining an issue. She wants you to take the content of her installations in a few days later.
I almost felt the artist was defensive of any idea but her own. When the audience asked selected questions that refered to a cinematic viewing or why does she display her work as only installations. She point blank refused the ideas.
What was interesting i felt it questions art made by artists because they say their an artist. Such as Junkola uses camera man to film her shots that are from the trade. The videos were undoubtly cinematic in presentation ( the high def cameras, wide screen) although this idea was rejected. I question the camera man seeking out an artists vision? Does the artist become a director?